Analisis Yuridis Akta Pernyataan Nafkah Terhadap Istri dan Anak Yang Dibuat di Hadapan Notaris (Studi Putusan MA RI No.3002/K/Pdt/2015)

  • rita sh,mkn Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Sumatera Utara
Keywords: Deed of Statement, Notary, Support

Abstract

A divorce is not a goal in a marriage; however a marriage sometimes ends with it, as experienced by AH and YR. YR filed a lawsuit against her husband AH to Muara Enim District Court after a divorce. YR felt financially injured by the action of AH for having violated the content of Statement Deed No.72 dated November 23, 2012 concerning Ah’s obligations to provide support for her and their children after their divorce took place. At District Court level, the judge in Ruling No.14/PDT.G/2014/PN.ME dated August 19, 214 granted parts of YR’s lawsuit. The judge stated that the Statement Deed is valid before the law, and is more valid by the issuance of the Higher Court Ruling No.114/PDT/2014/PT.PLG; which strengthens the District Court Ruling. However, the judge at cassation level granted the cassation application filed by AH. I the concern of the Supreme Court Judge, the Statement Deed is legally defective because it contradicts Article 45 paragraph (2) of the Marriage Act. The research problems are how about the legal force of the Deed of Statement to provide support for wife and child that was drawn up before a Notary, how about the legal consideration of the judge in the Supreme Court Verdict  No.3002K/PDT/2015 and how about the legal liability of the Notary for the revocation of the Deed of Statement pursuant to the Supreme Court Verdict No.3002K/PDT/2015.

            Thic is a normative juridical research which analyzes the law, It employs descriptive analysis approach. The data are analyzed qualitatively.

            The Deed of Statement No.72 dated November 23, 2012, that was drawn up before Notray AD contains a statement of promise or a clause that does not fulfill  the ojective requirements for an agreement. It bocomes null and void and has no legal force. It has been degraded in to an underhanded deed.

            The Supreme Court Verdict lacks of consideration because the judge was not sufficiently conscientious and has no evident legal ground. The degraded Statement Deed may become the ground to the injured party to file a lawsuit for indemnity such as compensation for all costs, fine and interests incurred to the Notray AD. It is suggested that a deed be carefully and conscientiously drawn up by noticing all prevailing legal aspects. It is recommended that judges have extensive knowledge, be update with the development of prevailing positive laws, so that they will produce responsible ruling with evident and obvious legal consideration. It is also suggested that notaries excercise  their role well to provide legal certainty and legal protection for the person appeaering before them.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Mohd. Idris Ramulyo, Hukum Perkawinan, Hukum Kewarisan, Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama dan Zakat Menurut Hukum Islam, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 1995, hlm.44.
M.Hasballah Thaib dan Marhalim Harahap, Hukum Keluarga dalam Syariat Islam, Universitas Al-Azhar, Medan, 2010, hlm.7.
R.Subekti, Pokok-pokok Hukum Perdata, Intermasa, Jakarta, 1985, hlm. 23 (selanjutnya disingkat “R.Subekti-I” )
Rosnidar Sembiring, Hukum Keluarga Harta-harta Benda dalam Perkawinan, Rajawali Pers, Depok, 2017, hlm.86-87.
R.Tjitrosudibio dan R.Subekti, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.PT.Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta,2006,hlm.102
Tan Kamello dan Syarifah Lisa Andriati, Hukum Orang dan Keluarga, USU Press, Medan, 2011, hlm.64
Abdul Manan, Aneka Masalah Hukum Perdata Islam Di Indonesia, Kencana, Jakarta,
2006, hlm.108.
Slamet Abidin Aminudin, Fiqih Munakahat 1, CV.Pustaka Setia, Bandung, 1999, hlm.183.
M.Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Hukum Perkawinan Nasional, Cet-I, CV.Zahir Trading Co.,Medan, 1975, hlm.83.
R.Subekti, Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Waris, Intermasa, Jakarta, 2004, hlm.8-9. R.Soetojo Prawirohamidjojo dan Asis Safioedin, Hukum Orang dan Keluarga, Alumni, Bandung, 1980, hlm.57.
Keberlakuan Putusan MK tentang Perjanjian Kawin Terhadap Perkawinan WNI, https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/ulasan/lt5847e8ddabfea/keberlakuan-putusan-mk-tentang-perjanjian-kawin-terhadap-perkawinan-wni, terakhir diakses tanggal 20 Mei 2019.
I.G.Rai Widjaya, Merancang Suatu Kontrak,Cet-II, Kesaint Blanc, Jakarta, 2007, hlm.13.
Habib Adjie, Hukum Notaris Indonesia, Refika Aditama, Bandung, 2008, hlm.121. (untuk selanjutnya disingkat “Habib Adjie-I”)
M. Yahya Harahap, Hukum Acara Perdata, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2009, hlm.566. Merry Natalia Sinaga, Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta di Bawah Tangan yang Telah Dilegalisasi atau Waarmerking oleh Notaris, Tesis, Magister Kenotariatan USU, Medan, 2007, hlm.50.
Akta Pernyataan nomor 72 tanggal 23 Nopember 2012.
Moh. Nazir, Metode Penelitian, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 1998, hlm.13.
Ronny Hanitijo Soemitro, Metode Penelitian Hukum Jurimetri, PT.Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 1990, hlm.11.
Johnny Ibrahim, Teori dan Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Bayumedia Publishing, Malang, 2005, hlm.241.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Kencana, Jakarta, 2010, hlm.141.
G.H.S Lumban Tobing, Peraturan Jabatan Notaris (Notaris Reglement), Erlangga, Jakarta, hlm. 41.
Muhammad Adam, Asal Usul dan Sejarah Notaris,Sinar Baru, Bandung, 1995, hlm.45.
Soedikno Mertokusumo, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Liberty, Yogyakarta,2006, hlm.149
R.Subekti, Hukum Pembuktian, PT. Pradnya Paramitha, Jakarta, 2005, hlm.25.
Victor M.Situmorang dan Cormentyna Sitanggang, Grosse Akta Dalam Pembuktian dan Eksekusi, Rinika Cipta, Jakarta, 1993, hlm.26.
Soedikno Mertokusumo, Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar, Liberty, Yogyakarta,1999,hlm.121-122.
R.Soegondo, Hukum Pembuktian, PT.Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta,1991, hlm.89.
Irwan Soerodjo, Kepastian Hukum Hak Atas Tanah di Indonesia, Arkola, Surabaya, 2003, hlm.148.
Sutrisno, Komentar Atas Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris, Medan, hlm. 470.
Sjaifurrachman dan Habib Adjie, Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta, Mandar Maju, Bandung, 2011, hlm.109.
Soedikno Mertokusumo, Hukum Acara Perdata di Indonesia, Liberty, Yogyakarta,1998,hlm.125.
Muhammad Rachardi, Akibat Hukum Perkawinan yang Tidak Dicatatkan Ketika Salah Satu Pihak Meninggal Dunia Menurut UU No.1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam, Tesis, Magister Kenotariatan USU, Medan, hlm.9.
R. Soeroso, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2011, hlm.295.
Irma Febriani Nasution, Perjanjian Kawin ditinjau dari UU No.1 Tahun 1974 dan Hukum Islam, Tesis, Medan, Magister Kenotariatan USU, 2008, hlm.10.
T. Jafizham, Persintuhan Hukum Islam di Indonesia dengan Hukum Perkawinan Islam, CV. Percetakan Mestika, Medan, 1977, hlm.112.
Keberlakuan Putusan MK tentang Perjanjian Kawin Terhadap Perkawinan WNI, https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/ulasan/lt5847e8ddabfea/keberlakuan-putusan-mk-tentang-perjanjian-kawin-terhadap-perkawinan-wni, terakhir diakses tanggal 20 Mei 2019.
Mochammad Isnaeni, Hukum Perkawinan Indonesia, Refika Aditama, Bandung, 2016, hlm.38.
Hilman Hadikusuma, Hukum Perkawinan Indonesia Menurut Perundangan, Hukum
Adat, Hukum Agama, Bandung, CV.Mandar Maju, 2007, hlm.132.
Miranty. Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Hasil Perkawinan Yang Tidak Dicatatkan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974, Medan : Magister Kenotariatan FH USU, 2012, hlm.24.
Undang-undang No.1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan
Undang Undang No. 2 Tahun 2014Tentang Jabatan Notaris.
Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Perdata
Published
2021-03-19
How to Cite
sh,mkn, rita. (2021, March 19). Analisis Yuridis Akta Pernyataan Nafkah Terhadap Istri dan Anak Yang Dibuat di Hadapan Notaris (Studi Putusan MA RI No.3002/K/Pdt/2015). Jurnal Perspektif Hukum, 2(1), 116-144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35447/jph.v2i1.319
Section
Articles