Figurative Meaning in “Lang Leav” Poetry

  • Tengku Mutiara Azti Universitas Harapan Medan
  • Maya sari Universitas Harapan Medan
  • Wan Anayati Universitas Harapan Medan
Keywords: Semantics, Figurative Meaning, Poetry

Abstract

This study concerns with the descriptive analysis of Figurative Meaning In “Lang Leav” Poetry. The problem of the study is (1) What are the types of figurative meaning used in Lang Leav poetry? (2) What is the dominant type of figurative meaning used in Lang Leav poetry? (3) Why was the type most dominantly used?  The objective of the study is to find out the types of figurative meaning that is used in Lang Leav Poetry and to know the dominant types of figurative meaning that is used in Lang Leav Poetry and the reason why was the type most dominantly used. This study used a Keraf’s (2009) theory. The research method used is descriptive qualitative method to classify and analyze the poetry. The data sources are found to originate from Lang Leav poetry. The total number of the types of figurative meaning in Lang Leav poetry: personification is 2 (6%), hyperbole is 14 (45%), metaphor is 3 (10%), symbol is 3 (10%), simile is 4 (13%) and irony is 5 (16%). Hyperbole is the most dominant types because it indicated activities that happen in Lang Leav poetry. Hyperbole as the dominant types of figurative meaning in poetry because there are so many expressions are over expressed.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Gibbs, Raymond W, Jr. And Colston Herbert L. 2012. Interpreting Figurative Meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kennedy, X.J. 1983. An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, and Drama. Boston Toronto. USA: Little Brown and Company.

Keraf, Gorys. 2006. Diksi dan Gaya Bahasa. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Kosasih, E. 2003. Ketatabahasaan dan Kesusastraan. Bandung: CV. YRAMA
WIDYA.

Kreidle, Charles W. 1998. Introducing English Semantics. London and New York: Routledge.

Leech, Geoffrey. 1974. Semantics the study of meaning.2nd Edition. New York: Pelican Books.

Lieber, Rochelle. 2009. Introducing Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nazir, M. 2003. MetodePenelitian. Jakarta: GhaliaIndonesia.

Parrine, L. 1978. Sound and Sense an Introduction to Poetry. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Inc.

Reaske, chistopher russel. 1966. How to analyze poetry. New York: Monarchi Press.
Robins, Robert Henry. 1989. General Linguistics: An Introductory survey.4th Edition. New York: Routledge.
Saeed, Jhon I. 1997. Semantics. China: Blackwell Publishers.
Sugiyono, 2016. Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: CV. ALFABETA
Tilak, Raghukul. 1990. Literary Forms, Trends and Wovements. New Delhi: RAMA BROTHERS EDUCATIONAL.
Published
2020-02-13
How to Cite
Azti, T., sari, M., & Anayati, W. (2020, February 13). Figurative Meaning in “Lang Leav” Poetry. Vernacular: Linguistics, Literature, Communication and Culture Journal, 1(I), 16-22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35447/vernacular.v1iI.129