Analisis Yuridis Penyelesaian Sengketa Desain Industri Eco Bottle (Studi Putusan Nomor 594 K/Pdt.Sus-Hki/2017)
Abstract
The industrial design lawsuit between Dart Industries, INC as a company wholly owned by Tupperware Brands Corporation, the industrial design case for Tupparware's Eco Bottle and the Defendant who owns the Bio Life Products has been decided with a decision Number 594 K/PDT.SUS-HKI/2017. Discusses how the lawsuit mechanism for the cancellation of industrial designs as one of the areas of Intellectual Property Rights, What are the legal consequences of using industrial designs without rights that have similarities with industrial designs registered under Law Number 31 of 2000 concerning Industrial Designs, How is legal protection for PT Dart Industries as a user of Industrial Design in an Industrial Design dispute with Bio Life products based on the decision of the Supreme Court Number 594 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2017. This type of research is normative legal research, where the approach to the problem is carried out by reviewing the applicable laws and regulations. The research results obtained, namely the absence of a substantive examination of the registration of industrial designs, the non-fulfillment of novelty elements in an industrial design and the absence of an explanation of the basic similarities in the Industrial Design Law. The legal consequences of using industrial designs without rights in accordance with the provisions of Article 46 of the Industrial Design Law, the holders of industrial design rights or licensees can sue the infringing party. The lawsuit filed by the Plaintiff PT. Dart Industri as the owner of the Eco Bottle beverage bottle industrial design. The judge had different basic considerations in passing the decision on the dispute over the shape of the Tupperware beverage bottle, namely in the Supreme Court's Decision Number: 594K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2017, the Judge stated that it was true that the shape of the Biolife Borneo bottle had the same industrial design as the Tupperware bottle owned by PT. Dart Industries while the Judge in the Supreme Court Decision Number: 874K/Pdt.Sus.HKI/2017, stated that the shape of the Biolife Borneo bottle does not have the same industrial design as the Tupperware bottle owned by PT. Dart Industries.
Downloads
References
Gautama, Sudargo, Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual Peraturan Baru Desain Industri, Bandung:Citra Aditya Bakti,2009.
Groves, Peter, Hak Milik Intelektual, Bandung:Citra Aditya, 2003.
Lubis, M. Solly, Filsafat Ilmu dan Penelitian, Jakarta: PT. Softmedia, 2012.
Mayana, Ranti Fauza, Perlindungan Desain Industri di Indonesia dalam Era Perdagangan Bebas, Jakarta: PT Grasindo, 2004.
Nasution, Bahdar Johan, Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum Hukum, Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2008.
Ramli, Ahmad M, Hak Atas Kepemilikan Intelektual, Bandung: Mandar Madju, 2000.
Santoso, Budi, Butir-Butir Berserakan Tentang Hak Kekayaan Intelektual; Desain Industri, Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2005.
Simanjuntak, Yoan Nursari, Hak Desain Industri; Sebuah Realitas Hukum dan Sosial, Surabaya: Srikandi, 2006), hlm.43.
Sinungan, Ansori, Perlindungan Desain Industri : Tantangan dan Hambatan dalam Praktiknya Di Indonesia, Bandung: Alumni,2011, hlm. 82.
Usman,Rachmadi, Hukum Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual Perlindungan Dan Dimensi Hukumnya Di Indonesia, Bandung: P.T Alumni, 2003.
Undang Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016, Tentang Merk
Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2000, tentang Desain Industri
Fadjri, Ivan, Penerapan Asas Kebaruan (Novelty) Dalam Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Hak Desain Industri Dari Tindakan Similiaritas Di Indonesia, Dipenogoro Law Jurnal Volume 5, hlm 7.
Faradz, Haedah, “Perlindungan Hak Atas Merek”, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol. 8 No. 1, Januari, 2008.
https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/hol20446/penilaian-kebaruan-menurut-hukum-desain-industri-indonesia/diakses pada tanggal 14 juni 2021 Pukul 08.45 Wib
https://www.jogloabang.com/pustaka/uu-31-2000-desain-industri, dikases pada tanggal 15Juni2021 Pukul 20.00 Wib.
https://www.rahlawfirm.com/permohonan-pendaftaran-dan-pembatalan-desain-industri/,diakses pada tanggal 17 Juni 2021 Pukul 20.55 Wib.
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2005.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
