ANALISA PENILAIAN KINERJA KARYAWAN DENGAN METODE SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING (SAW) DI UD. MARIADI RANGKA

  • Rini Halila Nasution Universitas Harapan Medan
  • Yetti Meuthia Hasibuan Universitas Harapan Medan
  • Jumadi Suratman Universitas Harapan Medan
  • Alda Febriansyah Chaniago Universitas Harapan Medan
  • Suriandi Suriandi Universitas Harapan Medan
Keywords: Performance Appraisal, Squeal, Simple Additice Weighting

Abstract

UD. Mariadi Rangka is a business engaged in furniture, precisely in the manufacture of sofa frames. For optimal productivity results, employees who have expertise and work discipline are needed. In this case the company UD. Mariadi Rangka has not implemented a Performance Appraisal system, therefore it is necessary to assess the performance of employees to assist the company in making decisions such as promotion of positions, giving bonuses, wage increases, and termination of work. The conclusion of the results of this study is that there are 5 weight criteria that will be used as a reference in employee performance assessment, namely attendance with a weight of 30, ethics with a weight of 15, time discipline with a weight of 20, work quality with a weight of 20, and quantity of results with a weight of 15. From the calculation of Sugeng are employees best in UD. Mariadi Rangka with a Preference value of 89,9.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] E. Susan, “MANAJEMEN SUMBER DAYA MANUSIA,” ADAARA Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, vol. 9, Aug. 2019.
[2] A. G. Anto, H. Mustafidah, and A. Suyadi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Menggunakan Metode SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) di Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto (Decision Support System of Human Resources
[1] E. Susan, “MANAJEMEN SUMBER DAYA MANUSIA,” ADAARA Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, vol. 9, Aug. 2019.
[2] A. G. Anto, H. Mustafidah, and A. Suyadi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Menggunakan Metode SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) di Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto (Decision Support System of Human Resources Performance Assessment Using SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) Method in University of Muhammadiyah Purwokerto),” 2015.
[3] Surya Akbar, “ANALISA FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI KINERJA KARYAWAN,” JIAGANIS, vol. 3, Sep. 2018.
[4] I. Kurnia, W. Program, M. Bisnis, S. Manajemen, and F. Ekonomi, “PENGARUH KEPUASAN KERJA TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN CV BUKIT SANOMAS,” 2018.
[5] M. Drs. H. Sofyan Tsauri, MANAJEMEN KINERJA 2014, Cetakan I. Jember: STAIN Jember Press, 2014.
[6] O. Kustiadi, Z. F. Ikatrinasari, J. M. Selatan, K. Jeruk, and J. Barat, “PERANCANGAN PENILAIAN KINERJA DENGAN METODE BEHAVIORALLY ANCHOR RATING SCALE DI PT. ZENO ALUMI INDONESIA,” Online, 2018.
Published
2020-10-30
How to Cite
[1]
R. Nasution, Y. Hasibuan, J. Suratman, A. Chaniago, and S. Suriandi, “ANALISA PENILAIAN KINERJA KARYAWAN DENGAN METODE SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING (SAW) DI UD. MARIADI RANGKA”, Jurnal Simetri Rekayasa, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 123-128, Oct. 2020.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>