Implementasi Peerconnection Classifier Pada Jaringan dengan Menerapkan Load Balancing dan Failover

Authors

  • Rahmad Nur Prodi Teknik Informatika, Fakultas Teknik dan Komputer, Universitas Harapan Medan, Medan,
  • Suriati Suriati Prodi Teknik Informatika, Fakultas Teknik dan Komputer, Universitas Harapan Medan, Medan,
  • Nenna Irsa Syahputri Prodi Teknik Informatika, Fakultas Teknik dan Komputer, Universitas Harapan Medan, Medan,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35447/jikstra.v7i1.1078

Keywords:

: failover, load balancing, internet

Abstract

The internet has become a secondary necessity that supports daily activities such as working, studying, and exchanging information. High-traffic websites can overload servers, degrade performance, or cause system failures. One effective solution is to implement load balancing and failover methods. Load balancing divides the load across multiple servers to prevent overloading, while failover ensures the system stays functional by switching to backups in the event of a failure. This study aims to configure load balancing and failover on wireless networks using mikrotik devices and two internet modems. The test results showed that failover successfully maintained the connection when the main port was disabled, while load balancing increased internet speed by combining the main and backup networks.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] M. A. Nugroho and R. Kartadie, “Analisis Kinerja Penerapan Container untuk Load Balancing Web Server,” JIPI (Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Informatika), vol. 1, no. 02, 2016.
[2] A. B. Prasetijo, E. D. Widianto, and E. T. Hidayatullah, “Performance comparisons of web server load balancing algorithms on HAProxy and Heartbeat,” in 2016 3rd international conference on information technology, computer, and electrical engineering (ICITACEE), IEEE, 2016, pp. 393–396.
[3] Suryanto, T. Prasetyo, and N. Hikmah, “Implementasi Load Balancing Menggunakan Metode Per Connection Classifier (PCC) Dengan Failover Berbasis Mikrotik Router,” Seminar Nasional Inovasi dan Tren (SNIT), vol. 1, no. 1, pp. A230–A238, 2018.
[4] T. Winarti, “Sistem Komunikasi Menggunakan Wireless,” Jurnal Transformatika, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 68, 2018, doi: 10.26623/transformatika.v5i2.22.
[5] W. K. Halawa and K. J. D. Lase, “Analisis Perbandingan Vpn Pptp Dan Eoip Menggunakan Metode Aqm,” Jurnal Sains Dan Komputer (INFACT), vol. 6, no. 01, 2021.
[6] M. I. Firdaus, “Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Load Balancing Metode ECMP (Equal Cost Multi-Path) Dengan Metode PCC (Per Connection Classifier) Pada Mikrotik RouterOS,” Technologia: Jurnal Ilmiah, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 165–170, 2017.
[7] N. Abdillah, “Load Balancing Dan Failover Pada Dua Jalur Koneksi ISP Menggunakan Metode Bandwidth Based Load Balancing,” Kumpulan Karya Ilmiah Mahasiswa Fakultas sains dan Tekhnologi, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 258, 2021.
[8] W. S. Jati, H. Nurwasito, and M. Data, “Perbandingan Kinerja Protocol Routing Open Shortest Path First ( OSPF ) dan Routing Information Protocol ( RIP ) Menggunakan Simulator Cisco Packet Tracer,” Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer (J-PTIIK) Universitas Brawijaya, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 2442–2448, 2018.
[9] A. Tedyyana, R. Kurniati, J. J. B. Alam, and S. Alam -Bengkalis -Riau, “Tedyyana, Membuat Web Server Menggunakan Dinamic Domain Name System Pada IP Dinamis Membuat Web Server Menggunakan Dinamic Domain Name System Pada Ip Dinamis,” 2016. [Online]. Available: www.namaanda.com’,

Downloads

Published

2025-04-25

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): Edisi April

Section

Articles

License

Universitas Harapan Medan