Kajian Pemilihan Sistem Drainase Berkelanjutan dalam Penanggulangan Banjir Perkotaan di Kec. Medan Selayang, Kota Medan
Abstract
Medan Selayang sub-district is one of the sub-districts in Medan City that experiences urban flooding problems. There are at least seven flood points found in the area. Until now, the solution has been to increase the size of the existing drainage channels, which is still a conventional drainage system that adheres to the concept of grey infrastructure. Therefore, it is necessary to find a new method of solving urban flooding problems that is more sustainable, where rainwater can flow and not cause flooding, but also has the opportunity to be absorbed into the soil layer to increase groundwater reserves. Sustainable drainage systems are one method that can solve these problems. There are at least ten methods in sustainable drainage system, therefore a decision-making analysis is needed to select the most appropriate infrastructure to be implemented in Medan Selayang Sub-district. Decision-making is done with the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method and the following order is obtained: First place with a score of 130 is occupied by rainwater harvesting, followed by permeable pavement and rain garden with a final score of 128 each.
Downloads
References
[2] Pemerintah Kota Medan, “Artikel: Ditargetkan Siap Oktober 2024, Kolam Retenso Selayang Atasi Tujuh Titik Banjir,” 2024. www.portal.medan.go.id
[3] B. Yang and S. Li, "Green Infrastructure Design for Stormwater Runoff and Water Quality: Emprical Evidence From Large Watershed-Scale Community Developments," Water, 5, pp. 2038-2057, 2013.
[4] J. Liu, D. J. Sample, C. Bell and Y. Guan, "Review and Research Needs of Bioretention Used for the Treatment of Urban Stormwater," Water, 6, 1069-1099, 2014.
[5] A. Alinezhad and J. Khalili, “New Methods and Applications in Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM) Springer Nature,” Cham, Switz., 2019.
[6] A. Graham, J. Day, B. Bray, and S. Mackenzie, “Sustainable drainage systems—A guide for local authorities and developers.” Online] Accessed on, 2020.
[7] M. Velasquez and P. . Hester, “An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods,” Int.J. Opera. Res, vol. 10(2), pp. 56–66, 2013.
[8] R. D. Agustian, E. Hidayah, and W. Y. Widiarti, “Analisis Prioritas Rehabilitasi Jaringan Irigasi Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting di Aliran Sungai Jompo,” J. Tek. Pengair. J. Water Resour. Eng., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 159–171, 2022.
[9] N. M. Putri, “Analisis Prioritas Rehabilitasi Bendung: Studi Kasus Bendung Cokrobedog, Gamping, Pendowo dan Pijenan di Kali Bedog,” Semesta Tek., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 10–17, 2018.
[10] D. Nurhikamah, Nursetiawan, and E.Akmalah, "Pemilihan Metode Sistem Drainase Berkelanjutan Dalam Rangka Mitigasi Bencana Banjir di Kota Bandung," Reka Racana: Jurnal Teknik Sipil., Vol.2, no.3, pp 39-50, September 2016.
[11] M. Scholz, et. all, "Selecting Suistainable Drainage Structures Based on Ecosystem Service Variables Estimated by Different Stakeholder Groups," Water, 5, pp. 1741-1759, 2013.
[12] A.Y. Muttaqin, "Kinerja Sistem Drainase Yang Berkelanjutan Berbasis Partispasi Masyarakat (Studi Kasus di Perumahan Josroyo Indah Jaten Kabupaten Karanganyar," Media Teknik Sipil, pp. 115-124, Juli 2007.
[13] S. N. I. Sari, "Perencanaan Drainase Perkotaan Wilayah Rawa Dengan Pendekatan Drainase Berkelanjutan di Merauke." Journal of Scientech Reseacrch And Development, Vol.6, Issue 1, pp. 1108-1115, Juni 2024.
[14] I. Ahmad et al., “Metode Multi-Attribute Decision Making Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan.” CV. EDUKATIF JAYA NUSANTARA, 2023.
[15] C.-L. Hwang, K. Yoon, C.-L. Hwang, and K. Yoon, “Methods for multiple attribute decision making,” Mult. Attrib. Decis. Mak. methods Appl. a state-of-the-art Surv., pp. 58–191, 1981.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.