Analisa Risk Priority Number (RPN) Terhadap Keandalan Komponen Mesin Thresher dengan Menggunakan Metode FMEA Di PT. XYZ
Abstract
PT. XYZ is a palm oil factory (PKS) producing crude palm oil (CPO). PT. XYZ has not implemented an effective engine maintenance system. The maintenance system that has been implemented is corrective maintenance, which is making repairs when there is damage. In addition, it is also assisted with planned maintenance that is scheduled every week to clean production machines. Therefore it is necessary to identify machine components that are susceptible to damage (critical components) and it is necessary to take special care measures for critical machine components by implementing a predective maintenance schedule (Prevention). Simulation techniques, often known as Monte Carlo simulation, estimate reliability using sampling random scenario. Failure mode effect analisys (FMEA) is defined as a process used to determine the actions that should be taken to ensure that each physical item or a system can run properly according to the function desired by the user then based on data processing, replacement of the roller binding drum binding drum , angle iron welding, chain transmission component replacement, drum stopper bearing replacement. Replacement of the drum stopper bolt, replacement of the chain transmission part is very loose and the replacement of the iron is carried out in corrective maintenance (replacement of components after damage occurs). And the results at the lowest value on the thresher engine component are in the Loose Transmission Chain component, the repair rate is 0.5 hours and the number is 0.999737189. Based on the results of the analysis of numbers (availability), the highest number is found in Broken Elbow Iron with a repair rate of 3 hours and the number 0.999605833
Downloads
References
[2] J. Online, P. Teknik, and M. Volume, “Jurnal Online Poros Teknik Mesin Volume 6 Nomor 1 45,” vol. 6, pp. 45–57.
[3] K. Saleh, “Analisa dan rancangan keandalan mesin thresher menggunakan overall equipment effectiveness, failure mode and effect analysis dan fault tree analysis,” 2018.
[4] M. B. Anthony, “ANALISIS PENYEBAB KERUSAKAN HOT ROOLER TABLE DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE FAILURE MODE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS ( FMEA ),” vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2016.
[5] H. P. Pasaribu et al., “METODE FAILURE MODE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS ( FMEA ) DAN FAULT TREE ANALYSIS ( FTA ) UNTUK MENGIDENTIFIKASI POTENSI DAN PENYEBAB.”
[6] D. I. K. Jember, “Identifikasi Risiko Pada Okra Menggunakan Failure Mode and … Jurnal Agroteknologi Vol. 13 No. 01 (2019),” vol. 13, no. 01, 2019.
[7] N. B. Puspitasari and A. Martanto, “PENGGUNAAN FMEA DALAM MENGIDENTIFIKASI RESIKO KEGAGALAN PROSES PRODUKSI SARUNG ATM ( ALAT TENUN MESIN ) ( STUDI KASUS PT . ASAPUTEX JAYA TEGAL ),” pp. 93–98.
[8] N. Badariah, D. Sugiarto, and C. Anugerah, “( FMEA ) DAN EXPERT SYSTEM ( SISTEM PAKAR ),” no. November, pp. 1–10, 2016.
[9] P. Pemanfaatan et al., “Pengkajian pemanfaatan mesin perontok gabah ( thresher ) dan mesin pengering gabah ( dryer ) padi sawah di jawa barat,” vol. 13, no. 287, pp. 93–106, 2010.
[10] K. Widodo, A. Susilawati, D. S. Arief, J. T. Mesin, F. Teknik, and U. Riau, “ANALISIS PERFORMANCE THRESHER PADA STASIUN PENEBAHAN DENGAN METODE OVERALL EQUIPMENT EFFECTIVENESS ( OEE ) DAN 5S ( STUDI KASUS : PT . TRI BAKTI SARIMAS ) Jom FTEKNIK Volume 5 Edisi 2 Juli s / d Desember 2018 Jom FTEKNIK Volume 5 Edisi 2 Juli s / d Desember 2018,” vol. 5, pp. 1–7, 2018
.png)
.png)
