Communicative Functions of Euphemism in Minang Language as a Reflection of Eastern Tradition

Communicative Functions of Euphemism in Minang Language as a Reflection of Eastern Tradition

  • Delvi Melina Karnaen Universitas Harapan Medan
  • Wan Anayaty Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara
  • Hendra Mulia Universitas Harapan Medan
Keywords: Euphemism, semantics, langgam kato

Abstract

This paper examines the refinement of language which is more polite expressions to avoid statement that are felt rude, which is a thesis entitled “Communicative Functions of Euphemism in Minang Language as a Reflection of Eastern Tradition”. This research uses a semantic approach, identifying the form of euphemism in Minang Language. The basis of the theory used is using the theory of Allan and Burridge (1991), in this theory explaining the function of euphemisms. This guides the community to have a more polite attitude in speaking. This manners in speaking are called Langgam Kato, namely Kato Mandaki (which is a greeting word used for people who are older or of higher social status), Kato Manurun (a greeting word used for people who are younger or of lower social status), Kato Malereng (which is a greeting word used for people who are in the same position and respect each other in a family relationship) and Kato Mandata (a greeting word used for people who are the same age or the same in terms of age, social status and closer relationship or familiar).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allan, K. and Burridge, K. 1991. Euphemism and Dysphemism: language used as
shield and weapon. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Allan, K and Burridge, K. 2006. Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Cencoring of
language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Allan, K and Burridge, K. 2007. The Pragmatics of Connotations.
Journal of Pragmatics. Vol.39, 1047-1057
Burridge, K. 2012. Euphemism and Language Change: The Sixth and Seventh Ages.
Cruse,A. 2006. A glossary of semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh
University Press
Kultural Masalah Bahasa. Fakultas sastra Universitas Andalas:
Gajahmada University Press.
Keraf, G.2004. Narasi dan Argumentasi. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Mahsun. 2005. Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan strategi, metode dan tekniknya.
Jakarta: Raya Grafindo.
Sudaryanto. 1993. Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana
University Press
Yondri, dkk, 1999/2000. Pengetahuan Sikap, Kepercayaan dan Prilaku Generasi
Muda Terhadap Tatakrama Budaya Minangkabau di Kota Padang.
Padang: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI.
Published
2023-07-07
How to Cite
Karnaen, D., Anayaty, W., & Mulia, H. (2023, July 7). Communicative Functions of Euphemism in Minang Language as a Reflection of Eastern Tradition. Vernacular: Linguistics, Literature, Communication and Culture Journal, 2(2), 137-142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35447/vernacular.v2i2.704