QUO VADIS: DINAMIKA POLITIK HUKUM PENGESAHAN UNDANG UNDANG PERAMPASAN ASET
Abstract
The recovery of assets derived from crimes has become one of the urgent and critical issues at the global level in Indonesia, namely to take back assets illegally obtained by and or who are not legally responsible so that the Government and the DPR based on their authority need to ratify the draft law on asset forfeiture immediately into law. The formulation of the problem in this study is How are the dynamics of legal politics in the formation of the draft law on asset forfeiture based on Law Number 13 of 2022 concerning the Formation of Legislation. The research method used is normative juridical law or library legal research (search library), by analysing literature or secondary data relevant to the topic. This research is descriptive analytical, the data obtained and processed and analysed to provide a comprehensive picture of the legal political dynamics that occur between the Government and the DPR in terms of passing the draft law on asset forfeiture into law, with data collection methods through document studies. The results showed that the legal political dynamics that occurred between the Government and the DPR so that the Asset Forfeiture Bill was not passed due to many things, including first: The Asset Forfeiture Bill is contrary to Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights Article 29 Paragraph (1); Second. Political interests of the Government and Parliament; Third. Coordination issues between law enforcement agencies; Fourth. The authority to adjudicate in the judicial system
Downloads
References
Cepy Indra Gunawan. (2022). Perampasan Barang Bukti Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dalam Rangka Pengembalian Aset Negara. Braz Dent J., 33(1), 1–12.
Fitriyani, D., & Maizaroh, M. (2023). Possibility of Implementing In-Rem Asset Forfeiture as an Asset Recovery Effort in Indonesia. AML/CFT Journal: The Journal of Anti Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism, 1(2), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.59593/amlcft.2023.v1i2.62
Ghulam Reza, M. (2024). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Perampasan Aset “Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture” Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 8(1), 1167–1181.
Hafid, I. (2021). Perampasan Aset Tanpa Pemidanaan Dalam Perspektif Economic Analysis Of Law. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 6(3), 465–480. https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol6.iss3.art3
Indrianto, A. (2024). Kontruksi Hukum Perampasan Aset Dalam Persfektif Economic Analysis of Law. Unes Law Review, 6(4), 11539–11551.
Khalila, A. (2023). Rejuvenasi KPK : Urgensi Pemberlakuan Rancangan Undang-Undang Perampasan Aset dengan Pendekatan In Rem dan Tinjauan Pendekatan Serupa pada Regulasi Unexplained Wealth di Australi. Fh.Ui. https://lk2fhui.law.ui.ac.id/portfolio/rejuvenasi-kpk-urgensi-pemberlakuan-rancangan-undang-undang-perampasan-aset-dengan-pendekatan-in-rem-dan-tinjauan-pendekatan-serupa-pada-regulasi-unexplained-wealth-di-australia/
Kurniawan. (2024). Kolaborasi Perpustakaan PPATK dan ICW Bahas Pentingnya RUU Perampasan Aset. PPATK, 1. https://www.ppatk.go.id/news/read/1417/kolaborasi-perpustakaan-ppatk-dan-icw-bahas-pentingnya-ruu-perampasan-aset.html
Latifah, M. (2015). Urgensi Pembentukan Undang-Undang Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Di Indonesia. Jurnal NEGARA HUKUM, 6(1), 17–30. http://www.ppatk.go.id/
Mahmud, P. (2005). Penelitian Hukum. Kencara Prenada Media Group.
Putra, N. R., & Linda, R. (2022). Impact of Social Change on Society From the Crime of Corruption. Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi, 8(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v8i1.898
Rahadian, D. (2014). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Menanggulangi Tindak Pidana Politik. Law Reform, 9(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v9i2.12451
Saputra, R. (2017). Tantangan Penerapan Perampasan Aset Tanpa Tuntutan Pidana (Nonconviction Based Asset Forfeiture) Dalam Ruu Perampasan Aset Di Indonesia. Integritas: Jurnal Anti Korupsi, Vol. 3(1), 115–130. https://jurnal.kpk.go.id/index.php/integritas/article/view/158
Sunan, U. I. N., & Surabaya, A. (2024). Tantangan Mekanisme Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture dalam Rancangan Undang-Undang Perampasan Aset di Indonesia. 5.
Susilo, J. S., Danil, E., & Mulyati, N. (2023). Pemiskinan Koruptor Sebagai Alternatif Pidana Tambahan dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia Dikaitkan dengan Rancangan Undang-Undangan Perampasan Aset. Unes Law Review, 6(1), 3781–3730. https://review-unes.com/
Tantimin, T. (2023). Penyitaan Hasil Korupsi Melalui Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Negara. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 5(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v5i1.85-102
Totok Dwi Diantoro; Saputra, R. (2024). Implementasi dan Pengaturan Valuasi Kerugian Ekologis dalam Perhitungan Kerugian Negara di Perkara Korupsi Sektor Industri Ekstraktif (I). Indonesia Corruption Watch. https://www.antikorupsi.org/sites/default/files/dokumen/Implementasi dan Pengaturan Valuasi Kerugian Ekologis dalam Perhitungan Kerugian Negara di Perkara Korupsi Sektor Industri Ekstraktif.pdf
Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.
Zilmi Haridhi. (2023). RUU Perampasan Aset: Revolusi Penegakan Hukum Melalui Pemulihan Aset yang Disalahgunakan. ICW. https://antikorupsi.org/id/ruu-perampasan-aset-revolusi-penegakan-hukum-melalui-pemulihan-aset-yang-disalahgunakan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
