ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP AKIBAT HUKUM PEMBATALAN AKTA JUAL BELI KARENA STATUS KEPEMILIKAN YANG TIDAK SAH (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 2514 K/Pdt/2019)

  • Rifda Karimah Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Sumatera Utara
Keywords: Legal Consequences, Sale and Purchase Deed, Grant Deed, Illegal Action

Abstract

The title of this research is "Juridical Analysis of the Legal Consequences of Cancellation of Sales and Purchase Deeds Due to Unauthorized Ownership (Study of the Supreme Court Decision Number 2514 K / Pdt / 2019)". Sale and purchase is an agreement in which the party who owns the land (the seller) binds himself to hand over his rights to the land which is subject to another party (the buyer). Transfer of land rights can not only be through buying and selling, exchanging, but can be through grants or because of inheritance. The problem that often arises as a result of grants is the lack of a Grant Deed owned by the grantee from the grantee, which then results in a dispute between the family of the donor and the recipient of the grant, especially the object being granted a piece of land. The land grant should have strong or valid evidence in this case the Grant Deed. Based on the results of the research, it is found that the legal protection to the injured party for the cancellation of the sale and purchase deed must be seen in the good faith of the parties in implementing the sale and purchase deed. If the sale and purchase deed is canceled and suffers a loss, it asks for compensation for costs purchased by the buyer in the context of purchase and delivery and can file compensation to the court. The cancellation of the sale and purchase deed made by PPAT is in accordance with the legal procedures in Government Regulation Number 10 of 1961 and Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration. The legal consequences of the cancellation of grants and the cancellation of the land sale and purchase deed made by PPAT in the Supreme Court decision Number 2514 K / Pdt / 2019 were parties that were the legal consequences of the Supreme Court decision Number: 2514 K / Pdt / 2019 which were carried out against Defendant I and Defendant II jointly and severally paid the costs incurred in this case.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afandi, Ali. Hukum Waris Hukum Keluarga Hukum Pembuktian Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, PT. Bina Aksara, Jakarta, 1983.
Artha Windari, Ratna. Hukum Perjanjian, Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta, 2014.
Badrulzaman Mariam Darus, Kompilasi Hukum Perikatan, PT Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2001.
Dimyati, Khudzaifah. Teorisasi Hukum, Muhammadiyah University Press, Surakarta, 2004.
Haryanti, Eko. Pembatalan Akta Hibah Wasiat Yang Dibuat Dihadapan Notaris dan Akibat Hukumnya, Jurnal Repertorium, ISSN:2355- 2646, Edisi 3 Januari-Juni 2015.
Ibrahim, Jhonny. Teori dan Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Bayu Media, Surabaya, 2014.
KH. Ahmad Azhar Basyir, Asas-Asas Hukum Muamalat (Hukum Perdata Islam), UII Press Yogyakarta, 2014.
Kartasapoetra, G. Hukum Tanah: Jaminan UUPA Bagi Keberhasilan Pendayagunaan Tanah, Bina Aksara, Jakarta, 1985.
Kumalasari, Yulia. Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pihak Pembeli Beritikad Baik Dalam Jual Beli Tanah Bengkok, Jurnal, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, 2016.
Haryanti, Eko. Pembatalan Akta Hibah Wasiat Yang Dibuat Dihadapan Notaris dan Akibat Hukumnya, Jurnal Repertorium, ISSN:2355- 2646, Edisi 3 Januari-Juni 2015.
M.A. Moegni Djojodirdjo, Perbuatan Melawan Hukum, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta, 1976.
Moleong, Lexy J. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung, 2016.
Muladi, Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, 2016.
Philipus M. Hadjon, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat di Indonesia (Sebuah Studi tentang Prinsip-Prinsipnya, Penanganannya oleh Pengadilan dalam Lingkungan Peradilan Umum dan Pembentukan Peradilan Administrasi Negara), PT. Bina Ilmu, Surabaya, 2014.
Projodikoro, Wirjono R. Asas-asas Hukum Perjanjian, Sumber Bandung, Jakarta, 1980.
Putri, Erza. Peran PPAT Dalam Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah, CV. Agung, Semarang, 2017.
Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. Kompilasi Hukum Periktan, PT Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2001
Soerodjo, Irawan. Kepastian Hukum Hak AtasTanah di Indonesia, Arkola, Surabaya, 2013.
Soerjopratiknjo, Hartono. Aneka Perjanjian Jual Beli, cet. 2, PT. Mustika Wikasa, Yogyakarta, 1995.
Soetomo, Pedoman Jual Beli Tanah, Perahlian Hak dan Sertifikat, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang 1981.
Subekti,R. Aneka Perjanjian, PT. Intermasa, Jakarta, 2014.
Subekti & Tjitrosudibio, R. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta, 2007.
Yudha,,Hernoko Agus. Hukum Perjanjian, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, 2010.
Yunirman Rijan dan Ira Koesoemawati, Cara Mudah Membuat Surat Perjanjian/Kontrak dan Surat Penting Lainnya, Raih Asa Sukses, Jakarta, 2009.
B. Perundang-Undangan
Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 Tentang Pendaftaran Tanah.
Republik Indonesia, Pasal 874 KUHPerdata.
Republik Indonesia, Pasal 1266 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.
Republik Indonesia, Pasal 1313 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.
Republik Indonesia, Pasal 1365 KUHPerdata.
Republik Indonesia, Pasal 1458 KUHPerdata.
Republik Indonesia, Pasal 1491 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.
Republik Indonesia, Pasal 1492 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.
Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2514 K/Pdt/2019
Studi Putusan Nomor 47/Pdt.G/2017/PN Pal.
Studi Putusan Nomor 27/Pdt.G/2018/PT Pal.
Published
2020-12-03
How to Cite
Karimah, R. (2020, December 3). ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP AKIBAT HUKUM PEMBATALAN AKTA JUAL BELI KARENA STATUS KEPEMILIKAN YANG TIDAK SAH (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 2514 K/Pdt/2019). Jurnal Perspektif Hukum, 1(2), 34-57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35447/jph.v1i2.246
Section
Articles