Kedudukan Hak Atas Tanah yang Dimiliki Peserta Plasma yang Mengundurkan Diri (Studi Pada Pt. Anugerah Langkat Makmur)

  • Fahrizzal Nasty Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Sumatera Utara
Keywords: Plasma, HGU, PT. Alam dan KUHD

Abstract

In General, the most common partnership pattern in Indonesia in plasma nucleus such as PIR Pattern, KKPA Pattern, and PRP Pattern. PT. AnugerahLangkatMakmur (PT. ALAM) operates in oil palm plantations and factories; it has some KUDs (Village Unit Cooperatives) in Langkat Regency and Mandailing Natal Regency. The problem arises when some of their members withdraw and sell their srocks so that there is no certainty about their rights on the plantations which legal standing is the HGU (leasehold) that has not yet regulated or covered by laws and PP (Government Regulation); therefore, it is necessary to have legal breakthrough to settle the problems of cooperative pattern in the plasma plantations at PT. ALAM. Partnership Pattern is a must and the legal consequence of the position of land rights owned by plasma plantation whose members withdraw from the plasma membership (A Case Study at PT. ALAM). The partnership contract is a written form as specified in the Decree of The Minister of Agriculture No. 98/Permentan/OT.140/9/2013 on the Guidelines for Plantation Business License in Article 29, paragraph 2. In principle, the relationship between nucleus and plasma is specified in the Plasma Nucleus contract which explains specially the right and obligation and is made before a Notary. According to Law No. 39/2014, plasma is required to implement plantation business partnership and to facilitate smallholding plantations (in the term of 3 years since the HGU is in effect, it has to be implemented by the plantation company). The legal grounds which stipulates that HGU can be bequeathed is specified implicitly in Article 28, paragraph 2 of UUPA (The Land Act) which states that HGU can be transferred to other party. “Explicitly, the inheritance of HGU is specified in Article 16, paragraph 2, point e PP No. 40/1996 which indicates HGU occurs by inheritance. The land rights of the plasma members who have withdrawn will be transferred to KUD.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ibnu Sufyan A.S, Sawit Melalui Pola Inti Rakyat (PIR), Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Opinion, Edisi 3, Volume 2, Tahun 2014, Hal 2
Sunarko, Budidaya dan Pengelolaan Kebun Kelapa Sawit dengan Sistem Kemitraan. Penerbit PT. AgroMedia Pustaka, 2009 Jakarta.
Mutiara Panjaitan, Faktor Penghambat Alokasi Luas Lahan Kebun Plasma Sebagai Syarat Perolehan Hak Guna Usaha Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit , Jurnal, Hal 2
Pasal 14 Undang-Undang No. 39 Tahun 2014 tentang Perkebunan.
http://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/cl6522/tanah-ulayat., diakses pada hari Selasa, tanggal 21 Maret 2018. Dikutip dari Mutiara Panjaitan, Faktor Penghambat Alokasi Luas Lahan Kebun Plasma Sebagai Syarat Perolehan Hak Guna Usaha Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit , Jurnal, Hal 3
Sutrisno Hadi, Metodologi Riset, (Yogyakarta: ANDI) 2000, hal.4
Soerjono Soekamto, Penelitian Hukum Normatif, (Surabaya: Bayumedia) 2006, hal. 14.
Abdul Kadir Muhammad, Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum, (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti) 2004, hal. 82
Jhonny Ibrahim, Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif, (Jakarta: Bayumedia) 2005, hal. 340.
Indra Surya dan Ivan Yustiviandana, Penerapan Good Corporate Governance Mengesampingkan Hak-Hak Istimewa Demi Kelangsungan Usaha (Jakarta: Kencana, 2006) Hlm 22
Dhaniswara K. Harjono, Pembaruan Hukum Perseroan Terbatas, (Jakarta: PPHBI, 2008), hlm. 167
Rachamdi Usman, Dimensi Hukum Perusahaan Perseroan Terbatas, (Bandung: PT Alumni, 2004), hlm. 47
I.G.Rai Widjaya, Hukum Perusahaan (Jakarta: Kesaint Blanc, 2002), hlm. 143
Indonesia (d), Undang-undang tentang Perseroan Terbatas, UU No. 40 Tahun 2007, LN No. 106 tahun 2007, TLN No. 4756, ps. 1 angka 1
Subekti, Pokok-pokok Hukum Perdata, cet. XXVI. (Jakarta: PT. Intermasa, 1994), hlm. 21
A. Partomuan Pohan, “Perseroan Terbatas Sebagai Badan Hukum” dalam Prosiding: Perseroan Terbatas dan Good Corporate Governance, Cet.IV, (Jakarta: Pusat Pengkajian Hukum, 2006), hlm, 22
Gunawan Widjaja, Resiko Hukum Sebagai Direksi, Komisaris & Pemilik PT (Jakarta: Forum Sahabat, 2008), hlm. 13.
Fred B.G. Tumbuan, “Mencermati Kewenangan dan Tanggung Jawab Direksi, Komisaris dan Pemegang Saham” dalam Prosiding: Perseroan Terbatas dan Good Corporate Governance, Cet. IV (Jakarta: Pusat Pengkajian Hukum, 2006), hlm. 192
R.T.Sutantya Rahardja Hadhikusuma, Hukum Koperasi Indonesia (Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Perkasa, 2005), hlm. 1
Hendrojogi, Koperasi: Asas-asas, Teori dan Praktik, (Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2007), hlm. 20-21)
Nindyo Pramono, Beberapa Aspek Koperasi Pada Umumnya dan Koperasi Indonesia di dalam Perkembangan, (Yogyakarta: TPK Gunung Mulia, 1986), hlm. 9
Sjamsudin Djahmat, Manajemen Koperasi, Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, 1997, Hlm. 93
Gragasin J.V., Philippine Coorporative Organization and Management and Agrarian Reform Program, Manila Gie Enterprise & Co Inc, Manila, 1973, hlm. 21
Ernawati Chotim, Disharmonisasi Inti Plasma dalam Pola PIR, (Bandung: Yayasan Akatiga, 1996) Hlm. 63
Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata (Burgelijk Wetboek), Diterjemahkan oleh R. Subekti dan R Tjitrosudibio, (Jakarta:Pradnya PAramita, 2009), hlm 475
Published
2021-03-19
How to Cite
Nasty, F. (2021, March 19). Kedudukan Hak Atas Tanah yang Dimiliki Peserta Plasma yang Mengundurkan Diri (Studi Pada Pt. Anugerah Langkat Makmur). Jurnal Perspektif Hukum, 2(1), 46-68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35447/jph.v2i1.315
Section
Articles