Tinjauan Yuridis Dasar Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Terhadap Pt. Wahana Pamunah Limbah Industri (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor : 234/Pid.Sus/2016/Pn.Srg)
Vicarious Liability
Abstract
With the stipulation of PT. Wahana Pamunah Limbah Industri (PT. WPLI) as a defendant, this is included in one system of criminal liability, the management in this case the directors have the responsibility to know all the events that occur in the field because it is the responsibility inherent in the management. Even though the management is not directly in the field, but has the responsibility that is always attached as long as the position as the manager of the business entity is attached. So in this case Choe Hoe Ryul as the Managing Director or representing the corporation of PT. Wahana Pamunah Limbah Industri in the court is subject to criminal liability. Whereas criminal liability to a corporation can then be identified in advance to identify who commits the crime and if the crime is committed by those who are the directing mind of the corporation, then the responsibility of the criminal act can be borne by the corporation. The problems studied are the application of vicarious liability theory in corporate criminal entrapment towards PT. Wahana Pamunah Limbah Industri in Decision Number : 234 / Pid.Sus / 2016 / PN.Srg dated August 9, 2016 is correct, and how the form of accountability of PT. Wahana Pamunah Limbah Industri for residents affected by B3 waste pollution.
This study uses a type of normative juridical legal research with a case approach. The data collection technique used is library research. Data analysis was carried out with qualitative analysis methods. Then in this analysis deductively drawn conclusions.
The result of the research showed in case Number : 234 / Pid.Sus / 2016 / PN. Srg on behalf of the defendant PT. Wahana Pamunah Limbah Industri, the Panel of Judges of the Serang District Court in its decision applied the vicarious liability theory to ensnare the defendant with Article 104 in conjunction with Article 116 paragraph (1) letter b in conjunction with Article 117 of Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management. The application of the vicarious liability theory is not right, the application of the strict liability theory is the right theory applied to ensnare PT. Wahana Pamunah Limbah Industri, in the decision of the Serang District Court, explained that the defendant PT. Wahana Pamunah Limbah Industri is charged with Article 116 paragraph (1), the article contains the principle of strict liability. Formulation of criminal law in the future in order to provide protection for victims of environmental crime by corporations, carried out by adding compensation sanctions in the form of the obligation to provide restitution to victims of environmental crime when the perpetrators of the corporation.
Downloads
References
Atmasasmita , Romli. “Pengantar Hukum Kejahatan Bisnis”, Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2003.
Muladi dan Dwidja Priyatno, “Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dalam Hukum Pidana”,Bandung: STHB, 1991.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. “Ilmu Hukum”, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000.
Penegakan Hukum; Suatu Tinjauan Sosiologis, Cetakan Pertama, Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing 2009.
Sjahdeini, Sutan Remi. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi”, Jakarta: Grafiti Pers, 2006.
Budianto, Agus. Delik Suap Korporasi di Indonesia, Cetakan I, Bandung: CV.Karya Putra Darwati, 2012.
Manthovani, Reda. Penuntutan Korporasi Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Dalam Kejahatan di Sektor Kehutanan : Optimalisasi Penggunaan Undang-Undang Pencucian Uang dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana di Sektor Kehutanan di Indonesia yang Dilakukan oleh Korporasi., Anthony O Nwator, Corporate Criminal Responsibility: A Comparative Analysis, Journal African Law, Volume 57.
Sunggono, Bambang. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2007.
Waluyo, Bambang. Penelitian Hukum Dalam Praktek, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2006.
Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Suatu Tinjauan Singkat,Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2005.
Nugroho, Wahyu. Aspek Sosiologi Hukum dalam Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan cetakan pertama, Yogyakarta 2016
Muhammad, Abdulkadir. Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2004
Arief, Barda Nawawi. Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2003.
Dobson, Paul. Criminal Law (Eight Edition), Thomson Sweet and Maxwell, London, 2008.
Ariefianto, Harry Agung. UNNES LAW JOURNAL Penerapan Sanksi Administrasi Pencemaran Lingkungan Hidup Akibat Kegiatan Industri (Studi Kasus Di CV. Slamet Widodo di semarang) Semarang, 2015.
Muhjad, H.M Hadip. Hukum Lingkungan Sebuah Pengantar Untuk Konteks Indonesia, Genta Publishing Yogyakarta 2015.
Lu Sudirman dan Feronica, Pembuktian Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Lingkungan dan Korupsi korporasi di Indonesia dan Singapura, 2011
PAF Lamintang dan Theo Lamintang, Hukum Penitensier Indonesia, Edisike 2 Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2017
E. Utrecht/Moh. Soleh Djindang, Pengantar dalam Hukum Indonesia, Ichtiar Baru, Jakarta, 1983, yang dikutip dalam Chaidir Ali, Badan Hukum, Alumni, Bandung, 2011
Putera, I.Gst Ngr Hady Purnama. Gagasan Penerapan Vicarious Liability Dalam Konsep Kuhp Atas Tindak Pidana Yang Dilakukan Anak., Volume 2, Nomor 1, Februari 2016. ISSN : 2356-4164, Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Singaraja
https://bismar.wordpress.com/2009/12/23/kejahatan-korporasi/, diakses pada tanggal 7 Agustus 2018.
http://www.pengertianpakar.com/2015/04/pengertian‐korporasi‐menurut‐pakar.html diakses pada tanggal 13 Februari 2019 pukul 19:08 Wib.
http://alviprofdr.blogspot.com/2013/02/pertanggungjawabanpidana-korporasi-oleh.html, diakses pada tanggal 25 Mei 2019 pukul 17.20 Wib.
https://business-law.binus.ac.id/2017/04/29/vicarious-liability-dan-kasus-rem-blong/, diakses pada tanggal 25 Mei 2019 pukul 17.30 Wib.
http://jurnal.umpalembang.ac.id/variahukum/article/viewFile/394/365, diakses pada tanggal 25 Mei 2019 pukul 18.00 Wib.
Muladi, Dwidja Priyatno, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi, (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2011) dari Jurnal Institute For Criminal Justice Reform, Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dalam Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, Desember 2015.
Tesco Supermarkets Ltd v. Nattrass [1972] A.C. 153, dari Jurnal Institute For Criminal Justice Reform, Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dalam Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, Desember 2015.
Cristina Maglie, “Models of Corporate Criminal Liability in Comparative Law”,Washington University Global Studies Law Review, (V olume 4: 547, Januari 2005), dari Jurnal Institute For Criminal Justice Reform, Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dalam Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, Desember 2015.
Sarah Field, Lucy Jones, “Death In The Workplace : Who Pays The Price?”, Company Lawyer, (Issue 6 : 2011), dalam Jurnal Institute For Criminal Justice Reform, Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dalam Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, Desember 2015.
Ansorie Sabuan, Syafruddin Pettanase dan Ruben Achmad, Hukum Acara Pidana, Bandung: Angkasa, 1990.
Kurniawan, Ridho. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Berdasarkan Asas Strict Liability (Studi Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Lingkungan Hidup), Jurnal Yuridis, Vol. 1 No.2, Desember 2014.
Atmasasmita, Romli. Perbandingan Hukum Pidana, Cetakan Pertama, Mandar Maju, Bandung, 1996.
Harahap, M. Yahya. Beberapa Tinjauan Permasalahan Hukum,Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 1997.
Hanafi Amrani dan Mahrus Ali, Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana, Edisi Pertama, Cetakan Pertama, Rajawali Press, Jakarta, 2015.
A.L.J. Van Strien, Badan Hukum Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup, dalam M.G.Faure, J.C. Oudijk, dan D Schaffmesiter, Ed, Kekhawatiran Masa Kini (Pemikiran Mengenai Hukum Pidana Lingkungan Dalam Teori Dan Praktik), Terjemahan oleh Tristam P. Moeliono, Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 1994.
Hardjasoemantri, Koesnadi. Hukum Tata Lingkungan, Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2002.
Dita Kartika Sari Hasibuan, Alvi Syahrin, Suhaidi, M. Ekaputra, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Korporasi Yang Melakukan Pembakaran Lahan Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup (Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bengkalis Nomor 547/Pid.Sus/2014/PN.BLS, USU Lawa Journal, Vol. 7. No.1, 2019.
Lamintang, P.A.F. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Citra Adiya Bakti, Bandung, 1997.
Alvi Syahri, Ketentuan Pidana Dalam Undang-Undang No. 32 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup.
Adriansah, Penerapan Asas Pertanggung-Jawaban Mutlak (Strict Liability) Dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Universitas Pasundan, 2017.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
