PRAPERADILAN TERHADAP SURAT PERINTAH PENGHENTIAN PENYIDIKAN (SP3) OLEH KEPOLISIAN (Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor 02/Pid.Prap/2020/PN.Ttd)
Abstract
This pretrial is regulated in Article 77 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which contains the district court is authorized to examine and decide, in accordance with the provisions stipulated in the law. This writing uses a library research method to examine secondary data and the type of data in this research is secondary data. Primary and secondary legal materials are arranged systematically and analyzed qualitatively. The results of the research show that the legal arrangements governing pretrial in the legal process of criminal cases are regulated in Article 77 to Article 83 of the Criminal Procedure Code and after the issuance of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 21/PUU-XII/2014 added the determination of suspects, searches, and seizures included as pretrial objects. The judge's consideration in examining and deciding the pretrial case of the termination of investigation by the police in the case of embezzlement in office was to grant the pretrial application because the termination of investigation of the criminal case of embezzlement in office had been carried out by the first respondent and second respondent unprocedurally by not carrying out the provisions that had been expressly regulated both in Article 109 paragraphs (1) and (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code and in Article 15 of the National Police Chief Regulation Number 14 of 2012.
Downloads
References
Hakiki, A. (2022). Surat Perintah Penghentian Penyidikan (Sp3) Yang Diterbitkan Berdasarkan Perdamaian Antara Tersangka Dan Pelapor Dalam Delik Biasa. Wacana Paramarta Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 21(1).
Harahap, M. Y. (2018). Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP (Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali). Sinar Grafika.
Harjono. (2018). Konstitusi Sebagai Rumah Bangsa. Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi.
Loqman, L. (2017). Pra Peradilan Di Indonesia. Ghalia Indonesia.
Mahrus Ali. (2016). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Sinar Grafika.
Pangaribuan, L. M. P. (2019). Suatu Studi Teoritis Mengenai Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. FH UI.
Soeparmono, R. (2015). Praperadilan dan Penggabungan Perkara Gugatan Ganti Kerugian dalam KUHAP. Mandar Maju.
Sunggono, B. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Raja Grafindo Persada.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
