PENGAMPUNAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI: SOLUSI ATAU KEMUNDURAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA
Abstract
The government's discourse in terms of granting pardons for corrupt crimes has generated a lot of controversy among the public and legal experts in Indonesia whether this democracy has experienced a legal setback because this pardon is not clearly and in detail regulated in Law Number 21 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes because corruption has a different pattern from other criminal offences because criminal offences must be adjusted to the character of the crime. The research method used is normative juridical law or legal research library (search library), by analysing literature or secondary data that is relevant to the topic. This research is descriptive analytical, the data obtained and processed and analysed to provide a comprehensive picture of the forgiveness of corruption crimes regulated in Law Number 21 of 2011 concerning Corruption Crimes with data collection methods through document studies. The results of the study indicate that the pardon of corruption crimes regulated in the TIPIKOR Law is not effective and does not provide legal certainty to be implemented by law enforcement officials because there is no detailed law that regulates guardianship by paying or compensation for corruption crimes that harm state finances. Even if this is implemented by the government, it will experience a setback in democracy in the field of law enforcement and many people will carry out corruption with the assumption that criminal acts can be replaced by fines or refunds for corruption crimes committed.
Downloads
References
Bolivia. (2024). Korupsi Kejahatan Luar Biasa, Pukat UGM Tidak Sepakat Ide Pengampunan Koruptor. Universitas Gadjah Mada. https://ugm.ac.id/id/berita/korupsi-kejahatan-luar-biasa-pukat-ugm-tidak-sepakat-ide-pengampunan-koruptor/
Haryanti Puspa Sari. (2024). ICW Nilai Pemberian Amnesti Bagi Koruptor Tak Beri Efek Jera. Kompas.Com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2024/12/23/11395561/icw-nilai-pemberian-amnesti-bagi-koruptor-tak-beri-efek-jera
Hutasuhut, W. R. G. Y. A. A. (2024). Pengampunan Koruptor Ancam Target Ekonomi Prabowo 8 Persen. Https://Liks.Suara.Com/. https://liks.suara.com/read/2024/12/27/192608/pengampunan-koruptor-ancam-target-ekonomi-prabowo-8-persen#:~:text=Pengampunan terhadap koruptor membuat pelaku,dijalankan berpotensi menjadi bancakan koruptor.
Maesty, A. D. P., & Soeskandi, H. (2022). Pemberian Remisi Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, 2(3), 1214–1240. https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v2i3.117
Mahmud, P. (2005). Penelitian Hukum. Kencara Prenada Media Group.
Mhd Ansor Lubis. (2024). The Perspective of the Community in the Medan Kota Sub- District on the Open and Closed Proportional Representation Electoral System. 23(3), 1–30.
Muwahid. (2015). Penerapan Hukuman Mati Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Al Qanun, 18(Hukum), 249.
Rivanie, S. S., Muchtar, S., Muin, A. M., Prasetya, A. M. D., & Rizky, A. (2022). Perkembangan Teori-teori Tujuan Pemidanaan. Halu Oleo Law Review, 6(2), 176–188. https://doi.org/10.33561/holrev.v6i2.4
Sajidin, M., & Mataram, U. (2021). Formulasi Kebijakan Pemberian Remisi Terhadap Narapidana Ditinjau Dari Aspek Politik Hukum (Formulation Of Policy For The Granting Of Remissions To Prisoners Based On Legal Political Aspects) M Ikhwanul Fiaturrahman M Imam Zarkasi Asadillah. Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.29303/jkh.v6i2.77
Setiawan, M. N., Afita, C. O. Y., Zia, H., & Agusta, M. (2022). Politik Hukum Pidana Mati Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Politik Dan Pemerintahan Daerah, 4(2), 252–262. https://doi.org/10.36355/jppd.v4i2.51
Sugiarto, A. (2020). Pidana Pemiskinan Koruptor Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Yustitia, 6(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.31943/yustitia.v6i1.102
Sukanto, S. (1990). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Empiris (1st ed.). Universitas Indoensia.
Thea, A. (2024). 3 Alasan Penolakan Pengampunan bagi Koruptor. Hukum Online. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/3-alasan-penolakan-pengampunan-bagi-koruptor-lt676afa1de2450/?page=2
Zulkarnain, M. F., Hilalludin, H., Said, F., & Suny, A. (2024). Relevansi Pengampunan Korupsi dalam Perspektif Islam Dengan Hukum yang Berlaku STIT Madani Yogyakarta , Indonesia efektivitas dan implikasi kebijakan ( Abou El Fadl , K . 2004 ). masalah tertentu . Dalam studi literatur ini , penulis membahas asuhan keper. 2(4).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
