TINJAUAN YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI PENYALAHGUNAAN DANA RETRIBUSI SAMPAH DI KECAMATAN PERCUT SEI TUAN KABUPATEN DELI SERDANG Studi Kasus Putusan No : : 94/Pid.Sus TPK/2022/PN.Mdn

Authors

  • maghfrah haitami Universitas Harapan Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35447/jph.v6i1.1117

Keywords:

Corruption , Misuse of Funds, Criminal Provisions

Abstract

Corruption is a serious problem that hinders development and harms society at large. In Indonesia, corruption has seeped into various sectors, resulting in economic losses and a decline in public trust in the government. The misuse of waste levy funds, which should be used to improve the quality of waste management services, is often allocated in an intransparent and unaccountable manner, resulting in significant losses to the community and the environment. Waste levies, which should be used to improve the quality of waste management services, are often allocated in an intransparent and unaccountable manner. This study examines corruption crimes in Indonesia using a normative juridical research method, which focuses on the analysis of legal norms that govern the eradication of corruption. The study found that while legal frameworks exist, law enforcement often faces challenges, including a lack of coordination between law enforcement agencies, complex bureaucracy, and a culture of impunity that persists. This study concludes that the provisions for the criminalization of corruption crimes (tipikor) in Indonesia, which are regulated in Law No. 31 of 1999, provide an important legal framework for eradicating corruption. However, the implementation of corruption laws still faces various challenges, including a lack of synergy between law enforcement agencies and complicated bureaucracy. An analysis of the misuse of levy funds shows that acts of corruption in the management of these funds harm the community and worsen the quality of public services. To increase the effectiveness of criminal punishment, systemic reforms are needed that include increasing the capacity of law enforcement agencies, strengthening oversight mechanisms, and educating the public about participation in corruption prevention. This writing uses a normative method with primary and secondary data legal materials systematically arranged and analyzed qualitatively.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amir Ilyas, Maulana Mustamin. (2012). Asas-asas Hukum Pidana.Kerja sama Rangkang Education. Yogyakarta
DR Andi Hamzah. (2008). Pemberantasan Korupsi. PT. Raja GraFindo Persada. Jakarta
Budianto, R. (2021). Kebijakan Penglolaan Sampah dan Partisipasi Masyarakat. Vol.12 No.3 . Jakarta
Ginsburg, R.B (2018). My Own Words. Simon dan Schuster. Amerika
Haryanto, R. (2020). Studi Kualitatif tentang Korupsi di Kalangan Aparatur Sipil Negara. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas.
Kementrian Lingkungan Hidup (2020)
Satrio, J. (2010). Hukum Pidana Khusus. Sinar Grafika. Jakarta
Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple Case Study Analysis. Guilford Press.
Rachel Dwi Aurindah (2024). Indonesia Corruption Watch (ICW). Jakarta.
Transparency International. (2020). Using Quantitative Methods to Measure and Analyze Corruption in Public Administration. Retrieved from https://www.transparency.org/en/publications/quantitative-method

Downloads

Published

2025-07-27

How to Cite

haitami, maghfrah. (2025). TINJAUAN YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI PENYALAHGUNAAN DANA RETRIBUSI SAMPAH DI KECAMATAN PERCUT SEI TUAN KABUPATEN DELI SERDANG Studi Kasus Putusan No : : 94/Pid.Sus TPK/2022/PN.Mdn. Jurnal Perspektif Hukum, 6(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.35447/jph.v6i1.1117

Issue

Section

Articles