PRINSIP RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PADA DIVERSI DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM PIDANA ANAK SEBAGAI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35447/jph.v6i1.1193Keywords:
Diversion, Diversion, Restorative Justice, Children in Conflict with the Law, Law Number 11 of 2012, Child ProtectionAbstract
The increase in cases of children in conflict with the law in Indonesia underscores the importance of a more humane approach to law enforcement. This study examines the implementation of the restorative justice principle in diversion practices for children as perpetrators of criminal acts, focusing on the case study of Medan District Court Decision Number 26/Pid.Sus-Anak/2019/PN Mdn. This research uses a normative juridical method with a case study approach to assess the extent to which the principle of diversion is applied to protect children's rights within the criminal justice system. The findings reveal that although Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System (UU SPPA) regulates diversion mechanisms, its implementation in the field still faces challenges, particularly regarding coordination among law enforcement officers and public understanding of children’s rights. The decision in this case successfully used diversion as a means of rehabilitation without stigmatizing the child, although there were limitations in resources and social support. This research is expected to encourage better understanding and consistent application of restorative justice principles in handling child cases in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Hadisuprapto, P. (2006). Peradilan Restoratif : Model Peradilan Anak Indonesia Masa Depan. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro.
Marlina. (2011). Hukum Penintentiere. Rafika Aditama.
Mulyadi, L. (2023). Wajah Sistem Peradilan Anak di Indonesia. Alumni.
Rukmini, H. M., Wulandari, W., Crim, M., & Azmaneli, ; (n.d.). Penerapan Diversi Pada Tahap Penyidikan Untuk Mewujudkan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana.
Setyowati, D. (2020). Memahami Konsep Restorative Justice sebagai Upaya Sistem Peradilan Pidana Menggapai Keadilan. Pandecta Research Law Journal, 15(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v15i1.24689
Syafaatun Nahriyah. (2018). Tumbuh Kembang Anak di Era Digital. Risâlah, Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Studi Islam, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3552008
Tigor Apred Zenegger, et. al. (2024). Urgensi Pelaksanaan Diversi Terhadap Anak yang Berkonflik dengan Hukum dalam Undang Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak dalam Pengulangan Tindak Pidana (Studi kasus terhadap Perkara Nomor 3/Pid.Sus Anak/2022.PN.Pnn dan Nomor 4/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022.PN.Pnn). Unes Law Review, 6(4).
Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak (2012).
Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomo 23 Tahun 2002 Perlindungan Anak.
Undang-Undang (UU) Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Anshorullah Anshorullah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
