BENTUK PERLNDUNGAN HAK ATAS TANAH MASYARAKAT DARI POTESI LIKUEDAKSI DALAM PERENCANAAN TATA RUANG DAN WILAYAH
Keywords:
mortgage rights, credit security, executorial force, legal protection, imposition and registrationAbstract
This study aims to examine the regulatory dimensions of mortgage rights over land as credit collateral in Law Number 4 of 1996, and to analyze the legal consequences and executorial powers if the encumbrance and registration processes are not carried out in accordance with applicable provisions. As a material security institution, mortgage rights are designed to provide certainty and legal protection for creditors through constitutive mechanisms, namely the existence of a principal agreement, the creation of a Deed of Granting of Mortgage Rights (APHT), and registration at the Land Office. However, in practice, various problems are still found, such as procedural deviations, administrative defects, confiscation related to land objects, and obstacles in implementing execution when the debtor is in default, which has the potential to create a position for the creditor as a holder of preferential rights. This condition shows the urgency to normatively examine the effectiveness of the provisions in the UUHT as a regulatory instrument, as well as to enforce the laws that arise if formal requirements are not met. This study uses a normative legal method with a regulatory, conceptualization, and case approach, is descriptive-analytical, and relies on secondary data obtained through literature review and analyzed qualitatively with deductive reasoning and a prescriptive approach. The results of the study indicate that mortgage rights only have validity and executorial power if all formal requirements for encumbrance and registration are met; if not, then the right loses its constitutive nature, so that the creditor does not obtain preferential rights or executorial power and his position changes to that of a concurrent creditor who must go through a judicial process to obtain debt repayment, which ultimately causes legal protection to be less than optimal.
Downloads
References
Anugrah, A., et al. (2023). Sistematisasi data fisik tentang daerah yang dilanda bencana alam. Unifikasi: Jurnal Hukum, 10(2), 1082.
Dianta, E. M. P. (2016). Metodologi penelitian hukum normatif dalam teori hukum. Jakarta: PT Karisma Putra Utama.
Fuad, F. (2020). Socio legal research dalam ilmu hukum. Jurnal Widya Pranata Hukum, 2(2), 9–11.
Harsono, B. (2008). Hukum agraria Indonesia: Sejarah pembentukan UUPA, isi dan pelaksanaannya. Jakarta: Djambatan.
Hidayat, M. A. (2021). Status hak atas tanah pada kawasan rawan bencana likuefaksi di Kota Palu. Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan, 5(1), 98–100.
Kementerian ATR/BPN. (2021). Laporan penanganan pertanahan pascabencana Sulawesi Tengah. Jakarta: Kementerian ATR/BPN.
Kramer, S. L. (1996). Geotechnical earthquake engineering. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Kajian Resiko Bencana (KRB). (2024). Pemerintah Kota Gorontalo: Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah.
Marzuki, P. M. (2008). Pengantar ilmu hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.
Marzuki, P. M. (2016). Penelitian hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.
Mertokusumo, S. (2009). Penemuan hukum: Sebuah pengantar. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Gorontalo Nomor 2 Tahun 2024 tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Provinsi Gorontalo.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 18 Tahun 2021.
Pradita, F. V. (2023). Perlindungan hak-hak sipil pembeli tanah dengan sertifikasi ganda. Jurnal Hukum Mahasiswa (JIMHUM), 4(1), 42. Diakses dari http://jurnalmahasiswa.umsu.ac.id/index.php/jimhum
Rahardjo, S. (2009). Hukum progresif: Hukum yang membebaskan. Jakarta: Kompas.
Rahayu, T. D., et al. (2023). Kepastian hukum kepemilikan hak atas tanah setelah mengalami likuefaksi tanah. LITRA: Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan, Tata Ruang dan Agraria, 2(2), 215–217.
Rukin. (2019). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Makassar: Yayasan Ahmar Cendekia Indonesia.
Sumardjono, M. S. W. (2008). Tanah dalam perspektif hak ekonomi, sosial, dan budaya. Jakarta: Kompas.
Tangahu, H. (2024, September 26). BPBD sebut Gorontalo rawan likuefaksi, ada daerah tak bisa dibangun gedung bertingkat. Tribun Gorontalo. Diakses dari https://gorontalo.tribunnews.com/2024/09/26/bpbd-sebut-gorontalo-rawan-likuefaksi-ada-daerah-tak-bisa-dibangun-gedung-bertingkat
Trijono, R. R., et al. (2020). Rekonstruksi batas bidang tanah pascabencana likuefaksi di Kota Palu. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 7(2), 312–314.
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria.
World Bank. (2017). World development report 2017: Governance and the law. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Zainuddin, A. (2011). Metode penelitian hukum. Jakarta: PT Sinar Grafika.
Zulfikri, M. K., et al. (2022). Urgensi penataan ruang berbasis mitigasi bencana dalam perspektif hak asasi manusia. Jurnal HAM, 13(2), 165–167.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Safwan Hangkiho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
