ANALISIS PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN TERHADAP HUKUM COVERNOTE NOTARIS (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 181/PDT/2019/PT.MKS)
Abstract
The covernote is not an authentic deed because it does not meet the requirements of the deed as stated in Article 1868 of the Civil Code. In general, a covernote is a letter explaining that there is an ongoing process in the management of unfinished deeds. In the case of a Notary issuing a covernote on the basis of a Notary being asked to manage, complete and carry out a legal relationship between the parties as a form of responsibility to serve the community. The research method used in this research is the Juridical Empirical method which is descriptive analytical, data collection is carried out using secondary data in the form of primary materials. The results of the study show that the act of a Notary issuing a Covernote can potentially become an unlawful act if the elements of an unlawful act are fulfilled. The act of issuing a Covernote which is potentially against the law, apart from being seen from the point of view of propriety, can also be seen from the error of the Notary concerned. Notaries who commit acts that are against the law will be sanctioned. Notary is part of the awareness that the Notary in carrying out his duties and position has violated the provisions regarding the implementation of the Notary's duties. The imposition of sanctions on Notaries is also to protect the public from Notary actions that can harm the community. This is related to the Supreme Court Decision Number 181/PDT/2019/PT MKS regarding the Notary's Accountability to the Covernote he made. Where the Covernote that is published itself is not carried out in accordance with the contents of the covernote, the Notary will be given a Civil Sanction.
Downloads
References
Adjie, H. (2008). Hukum Notaris Indonesia Tafsir Tematik Terhadap UU.No. 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris.
Ali, Z. (2009). Metode Penelitian Hukum.
Djojodirjo, M. . M. (1982). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum.
Ghofur, A. (2018). Lembaga Kenotariatan Indonesia: Persfektif Hukum Dan Etika.
Indonesia, M. A. D. I. N. (2005). Hasil Kongres Luar Biasa Ikatan Notaris Indonesia.
Kie, T. T. (2007). Buku I Studi Notariat Serba-Serbi Praktek Notariat.
Leny Helena &, F. H. (2017). Notaris Indonesia.
M, H. P. (1996). Penegakan Hukum Administrasi Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Ketentuan Pasal 20 Ayat 3 Dan 4 UU No. 4 Tahun 1982 Tentang Ketentuan-Ketentuan Pokok Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup.
Mariam Darus Baadrulzaman. (2001). KUHPerdata Buku III,Hukun Perikatan Dengan Penjelasannya.
Saputro, D. A. (2008). Jati Diri Notaris Indonesia, Dulu,Sekarang Dan Di Masa Datang.
Setiawan, R. (1999). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perikatan.
Wawancara, (2019).
Sjaifurrachman. (2011). PertanggungJawaban Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta.
Suhar, A. A. M. (2013). Analisis Yuridis Normatif Terhadap Pemalsuan Akta Autentik Yang Dilakukan Oleh Notaris, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
