PENGHAPUSAN PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA PELAKU PEMBELAAN DIRI YANG MENGAKIBATKAN HILANGNYA NYAWA ORANG (Analisis Yuridis Putusan Nomor 61/Pid.B/2019/PN. Cbd)
Abstract
Ccompulsory defence, an act justifying self-defense in the event of a sudden attack or threat of attack; however, the law cannot justify all forms of nature and method of defense and cannot reasonably limit defense. In other words, rational defense is an attack or threat. . In writing this paper I will examine secondary data through case analysis using library research methods, but the type of research data is secondary data. Legislation to rule out self-defense offenses that result in the death of another person is regulated in Article 49 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Code. Law enforcement that overrides the perpetrator's criminal responsibility in self-defense that results in the death of another person, the defendant's actions against the law, and the defendant's resistance in the form of forced or emergency defense. Decision Number 61/Pid.B/2019/PN. The CBD stated that the act was not a crime, so the accused must be acquitted of all charges.
Downloads
References
Dwi Dodik Romadoni Wijaya, H. Z. M. (2022). Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Karena Membela Diri Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam dan Hukum Pidana Nasional. 3(December), 320–330. https://doi.org/10.35719/rch.v3i3.178
Izaak, R. (2015). Penerapan alasan Penghapus Pidana dan Pertimbangan Hukumnya. Riskesdas 2018, 3(6), 131–132.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. (n.d.).
M, H. (2014). Alasan Penghapusan Pidana Teori dan Studi Kasus. Refika Aditama.
Mentari, B. M. R. (2020). Saksi Pidana Pembunuhan dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana dengan Hukum Islam. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 23(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.56087/aijih.v23i1.33
Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum.
Muhammad, A. (2004). Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Mujaddidi, S. (2022). Konstitusionalitas Pembatasan Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 18(3), 539. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1833
Poernomo. (2018). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Ghalia Indonesia.
Samudra, I. (2020). Pembelaan Terpaksa Yang Melampaui Batas (Noodweer Exces) Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam. Fakultas Ilmu Agama Islam Universitas Islam Indonesia.
Sanjaya, I. G. W. M., I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha, & I Made Minggu Widyantara. (2022). Pembelaan Terpaksa Melampaui Batas (Noodweer Exces) dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Begal Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Diri. Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, 3(2), 406–413. https://doi.org/10.55637/jkh.3.2.4847.406-413
Sutorius. (2010). Hukum Pidana. Liberty.
Syafaat, J. D. (2022). Pembelaan Terpaksa (Noodweer) Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana, HAM & Hukum Islam. 8.5.2017, 2003–2005. http://eprints.ums.ac.id/105915/16/NASKAH PUBLIKASI FINAL-1.pdf
Wahyuni, F. (2017). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia. In Perpustakaan Nasional.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
