KEABSAHAN SERTIFIKAT JAMINAN HAK TANGGUNGAN ELEKTRONIK SEBAGAI PELUNASAN KREDIT BERMASALAH

  • Ariqah Nasution Universitas Harapan Medan

Abstract

One form of collateral regulated under statutory regulations is a mortgage guarantee right where the object is a movable object based on UUPA number 60 of 1960. Currently, due to developments in science and technology, previously conventional mortgage guarantee certificates have changed to electronic guarantee certificates. mortgage right which is shortened to el certificate. The problem is what is the validity of the electronic mortgage guarantee certificate as collateral for non-performing loans? The research method used in this research is normative legal research or research which is synonymous with library research which is by developments in society. The validity of the electronic mortgage guarantee certificate as evidence for non-performing loans has the same legal force as manual mortgage rights, where the mortgage rights have the same force as a court decision in the event of problematic credit or the debtor defaults. Collateral objects registered based on electronic mortgage rights can be executed as debt repayment to the debtor. This is by the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Number 9 of 2019 concerning Electronic Integrated Mortgage Services, the ITE Law, and several other regulations relating to the validity of electronic documents.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alimuddin, N. H. (2021). S a s i. 27(28), 335–345.
Ardhanary, D. C. (2021). Implikasi Hukum Peraturan Pelayanan Hak Taggungan Secara Elektronik Terhadap Ppat Dan Kreditur Di Kota Yogyakarta. Jurnal Officium Notarium, 1(1), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.20885/jon.vol1.iss1.art7
Arkisman, N. A. L. (2020). Kepastian Hukum Sertipikat Hak Tanggungan Elektronik Dalam Hukum Pembuktian Di Peradilan Menurut Hukum Acara Perdata. Jurnal Pro Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik, 9(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.55129/jph.v9i2.1193
Depri Liber Sonata. (2014). Metorde Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Empiris: Karakter Khas Dari Metode Meleliti Hukum. 8(1), 15–35.
Dewa Ayu Sri Arthayani Gusti Agung Ayu Dike Widhiaastuti, I. I. (2014). Eksekusi Kredit Macet Terhadap Hak Tanggungan. file:///C:/Users/USER/Downloads/20939-1-40379-1-10-20160516%20(1).pdf
Fitri, A. (2018). Perlukah Sita Eksekusi Terhadap Objek Hak Tanggungan.
Hakim Abdul. (2017). Alternatif Penyelesaian Kredit Macet Pada Lembaga Perbankan (Studi Pada BRI Rantauprapat). Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi, 5(1).
Ibrahim, J. E. & J. (2018). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif & empiris, Prenadamedia Group.
Lastuti Abubakar. (2015). Telaah Yuridis Perkembangan Lembaga dan Objek jaminan (Gagasan Pembaharuan Hukum Jaminan Nasional). Buletin Hukum Kebanksentralan, 12(No. 1), 1–16.
Nenden Herawati Suleman. (2007). Upaya Penyelesaiaan Kredit Macet. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah, 5(2).
Ni Putu Yunika Sulistyawati, Sang Ayu Made Ary Kusumardhani, I. K., & Murti, I. W. (2022). Kepastian Hukum Pendaftaran Hak Tanggungan Berdasarkan Peraturan Menteri Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Kepada Badan Pertaahan Nasional 5 Tahun 2020 Tentang Pelayanan Hak Tanggungan Terintegrasi Ssecara Elektronik. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum, 8(2), 230–242.
Oka, M., Wiguna, C., Waturenggong, J., 135, N., & Klod, D. P. (2017). Surat Kuasa Membebankan Hak Tanggungan Dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Pemenuhan Asas Publisitas Dalam Proses Pemberian Hak Tanggungan. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 14(4).
Puspitasari, A. (2021). Kekuatan Eksekutorial Sertifikat Hak tanggungan Elektronik Terhadap Jaminan Kredit Perbankan. Jurnal Hukum & Kenotariatan, 5(4), 621–638.
Widyastuti, E. F. (2021). Kedudukan Sertipikat Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti Dan Tanggung Jawab Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Serta Kantor Pertanahan. Officium Notarium, 3(1), 476–484.
Winarno, J. (2016). Penyelesaian Kredit Macet Dengan Jaminan Sertifikat Hak Milik Atas Tanah Menurut undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 Tentang Hak Tanggungan. Jurnal Independent, 4(1), 28–35.
Published
2024-01-16
How to Cite
Nasution, A. (2024, January 16). KEABSAHAN SERTIFIKAT JAMINAN HAK TANGGUNGAN ELEKTRONIK SEBAGAI PELUNASAN KREDIT BERMASALAH. Jurnal Perspektif Hukum, 4(1), 43-51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35447/jph.v4i1.857
Section
Articles